Cultural Narratives in Mathematics Education

Metaimagem

Today's exploration begins with a question: why do we tend to separate numbers, language, and images in our teaching of mathematics? This division, often taken for granted in traditional education, is not an inherent truth about the nature of mathematics. Rather, it is a reflection of deeply rooted social and cultural constructions.

Metaimagem

Consider how numbers are often hailed as the epitome of logic and objectivity—symbols stripped of context, belonging to an idealized mathematical realm. Yet this perspective overlooks something crucial. Numbers don’t exist in isolation from our world of expression. They are, arguably, one mode of communication among many, just as functional and integral as the words we use to tell stories or the images we craft to convey ideas visually. Their meanings emerge through collective context, through our culture.

Metaimagem

A fascinating example of this interplay can be observed in the responses from students who participated in the Brazilian Mathematics Olympiad for Public Schools, the OBMEP. Here, linguistic diversity markedly enhanced how students tackled complex problems. These responses, which departed from rigid formulas and instead employed multimodal communication, reflect an extraordinary capacity for blending text, diagrams, and even implied cultural narratives within their reasoning processes. The language used—sometimes precise, other times informal—added layers to their problem-solving strategies, showcasing a richer, more nuanced engagement with the mathematics.

Metaimagem

Moreover, the analysis of discursive markers in these responses reveals their deep connection to cultural contexts. These markers, whether subtle repetitions, anaphoric references, or even shifts in linguistic formality, were not mere artifacts of expression. They shaped the mathematical reasoning itself. A student’s use of a phrase like "it follows then" or even a diagram indicating relationships conveyed an underlying cultural awareness—an understanding that meaning, whether mathematical or linguistic, is always layered with context.

Metaimagem

Reflecting on these observations, we must ask ourselves how much is lost when we strip mathematics of its cultural and linguistic dimensions, presenting it as a neutral, abstract domain. Perhaps it is through these discursive elements, these markers, that mathematics truly comes alive as a human endeavor—a shared narrative rather than a sterile exercise in numbers alone.

Metaimagem

Ethnomathematics invites us to reimagine mathematics not as a cold, universal language but as an expressive tool deeply embedded in culture, shaped by the lived experiences of different communities. It demands a reframing, asking us to see beyond formulas and algorithms, to acknowledge the narratives and contexts in which mathematical reasoning unfolds.

Metaimagem

Brazilian researcher Rogério Lourenço offers a compelling concept here: tecnography. This idea suggests that mathematical practices are best understood as cultural artifacts, blending language, images, and numerical reasoning into a cohesive whole. His analysis of exceptional student responses in the Brazilian Mathematics Olympiad for Public Schools, or OBMEP, brings this to life. These responses, marked by their diversity, demonstrate how cultural context and non-verbal elements can coexist to produce innovative problem-solving strategies.

Metaimagem

Take, for example, a particular case from OBMEP where students were tasked with explaining why certain results could not be achieved using prescribed operations. In high-scoring responses, students demonstrated their reasoning through text, coupled seamlessly with elegantly drawn visual aids. These diagrams—arrows connecting steps, geometric shapes highlighting relationships—were more than illustrations. They actively guided the logic, creating a dialogue between the visual and the verbal. The result? A clarity rooted not just in raw calculation, but in a narrative reflective of cultural understanding.

Metaimagem

One striking observation is how some students used colloquial expressions within their explanations, adapting mathematical rigor into accessible and relatable language. For example, instead of a detached phrase like "calculate the difference between sets," they might phrase it as "it won't fit together, you know, because of this gap." These seemingly informal touches were not signs of a lesser understanding. On the contrary, they revealed intuitive reasoning, bridging abstract mathematical concepts with practical, culturally infused expressions.

Metaimagem

And then there are the markers of discourse—those subtle, often unconscious, cues such as repetition, deixis, or anaphora that suggest a student's relational approach to the problem. When a student writes “as shown here,” while pointing to an accompanying diagram, it’s not a mere textual flourish. It is an invitation. An invitation to engage with their reasoning visually, narratively. It is through such layered approaches that ethnomathematics becomes not only a method but also a narrative—a story of math told in the words, numbers, and images of unique cultural voices.

Metaimagem

This interplay of diagrams, linguistic style, and cultural context underscores a broader truth about mathematics. It refuses to remain confined to artificial boundaries. Instead, it points outward—toward storytelling, toward shared meaning, and, most importantly, toward collaboration across disciplines. This, however, leads to another provocative question. What would it take for us to intentionally design our educational systems to foster such culturally rich, multidisciplinary understandings of mathematics?

Metaimagem

In recent discussions, we've revealed how mathematics is far more than abstract formulas; it's a reflection of culture, transcending its numeric roots by integrating language and images into cohesive narratives. Now, let's turn our gaze ahead. What can education become when it fully embraces this cultural and multimodal richness? How do we chart a path forward where anthropology, linguistics, and mathematics collaborate not as parallel disciplines, but as partners?

Metaimagem

The concept of tecnography reminds us that mathematics is not just a transfer of knowledge—it’s a cultural practice shaped over generations. By incorporating this ethos, we can imagine curricula that do justice to the diverse ways students think and communicate. Take Brazil's BNCC, for example. While it aims for inclusivity, many critiques highlight its hesitance to embrace the full spectrum of cultural diversity. What would happen if, instead, it celebrated the stylistic nuances—the informal phrases, visual elements, and narrative coherence—that minority and regional voices bring to mathematical reasoning?

Metaimagem

An interdisciplinary curriculum built on these principles would equip educators with tools to recognize and integrate cultural dynamics. Picture classrooms where teachers see a child’s sketch or linguistic improvisation—what some might dismiss as "off-task"—as a legitimate mathematical argument. Here, anthropology offers insights into cultural patterns, linguistics decodes the interaction of syntax with meaning, and mathematics weaves these into logical reasoning. Together, they would create a symphony of learning.

Metaimagem

But let's face it—standardized assessments lag behind. They seldom allow space for cultural expression or semiotic diversity, favoring rigid, contextless correctness over nuanced thought. Global assessments must evolve. They should measure not just outcomes but processes: how students reach their conclusions, whether through symbol, diagram, or regional idiom. Can we truly innovate without addressing this gap?

Metaimagem

As we close today’s journey, I leave you with this: What will it take to reimagine learning as a tapestry of numbers, words, and images—woven differently in every culture but inherently interconnected? Perhaps, in this reimagined space, students won't just solve problems. They’ll reshape the very role mathematics plays in our collective understanding of the world. And on that note, we’ll leave it here for today. Continue reflecting, and until next time.